DocDePanda187123
fitasfuk50's Operating System
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2013
- Messages
- 8,074
- Reaction score
- 5,826
- Points
- 283
Doc, could you elaborate one why you prefer less frequent large dose pinning for long esters? I mean I understand what you're getting at with the higher peak, but how do you feel this benefits you vs the more stable frequent route. I'm curious about this as I will be running both short and long esters soon. Maybe start a thread so we don't hijack Seeks. I will also accept PM, email, stripper gram, and carrier pigeon.
I like carrier pigeons and notes hidden in the ass cheeks of big booty hoes....
In Anabolics William Llewellyn suggests that higher peak levels may provide more benefit towards gains then more stable levels. He talks about it in the context of orals and splitting the dose throughout the day vs taking all at once.
The body peaks and troughs hormones in it's own also. Test levels vary greatly throughout the day. Pinning once a week basically mimics this but on a weekly schedule vs a daily one.
Although it's a stretch and maybe misleading in a way, whey protein is thought to build muscle minutely better bc it peaks in your body faster than casein. Casein bc of it's more steady levels is thought to be better for anti-catabolism.
Anecdotally, I've ran my same batch of tren at twice a week and another time at once. The sides were more agressive when pinning once a week but I just felt like I did better with he once a week pinning. Could be placebo but since I'd rather pin less than more anyway I stuck with it.
There's no conclusive answer either way. It's based on some, and by some I mean a little, evidence but also a pet theory of mine.
Now where I my Latina big booth hoes!!!