Long story short these 2 anabolics are always competing for senior status. By separating the drugs don't intermix this giving you less aromitization. It's called osmosis, very simple truth. Now with that being said, mixing test and eq is of greater value vs the previous theory. As you know never mix tren e and test e as the test e will slightly cancel.out the tren. Now if one chooses not to shoot separately I don't think it makes a significant difference early on but after long term use it absolutely does 1000%.
Oh now u can't mix test and deca in the same syringe? Ok well I've been doing that for years and have no problems with that. And the test and Tren competing for receptors is bullshit in my opinion too. So much ****ing regurgitated bullshit bro science garbage it's ridiculous
Bullshit.
The data on AR binding affinity is weak as hell so there is no way you can possibly come to those conclusions.
Binding affinity is also just one piece of the puzzle.
For example, Dbol has weak binding affinity to the AR but more than makes up for it with a prolonged half life and increased tendency to stay in an unbound state (C17 alpha alkylation ftw brah). So the time the compound stays in your system, and it's ability to not be bound up by a serum protein (think SHBG) can make up for the fact that compound A binds to the AR "before" compound B.
Your also ignoring the fact that AR numbers increase over time (so we don't have the issue of limited receptor sites) and overall dosage MORE than makes up for any "competition" issues.
Like I said, bullshit.
Respectively, my background is in Chemistry, PHD. i have been involved in NFL drug studies with various Pharmaceutical companies and i respectively totally disagree. Do you have any data to support your assumptions. Real Data exists- "Real data" if one has the understanding and background training to interpret.
I really wanted to like this guy but don't
You make a lot of claims but haven't really shown us any "real data" either. Sorry bud but we aren't going to believe you just because you claim you are a chemist and have done drug studies
You make a lot of claims but haven't really shown us any "real data" either. Sorry bud but we aren't going to believe you just because you claim you are a chemist and have done drug studies
So this is only if the oils are mixed together but doesn't apply when both hormones are released in your body
Please show me your data not from something you read. We all have injected serums, thats not data. We all claim to notice major differentials from cycle to cycle but I am talking about real logged data....I will Mention one name and its probably going overboard as i signed a NCNDA with this md years ago to protect our work from being posted outside of our projects and the test samples i sent to him - Research this MD Julian Bailes, his work is in head trauma and i personally helped him and worked with him on several projects involving anabolics.
Respectively, my background is in Chemistry, PHD. i have been involved in NFL drug studies with various Pharmaceutical companies and i respectively totally disagree. Do you have any data to support your assumptions. Real Data exists- "Real data" if one has the understanding and background training to interpret.