knightmare999
Elite
- Joined
- Apr 10, 2017
- Messages
- 820
- Reaction score
- 668
- Points
- 63
I've read a lot of old threads on this board.
Something interesting said in a thread on tren (originally by CobraStrike, I believe) was along the lines of "tren potentiates test." Anyone have any thoughts on interpreting that?
Between other threads and research elsewhere, it seems most people run tren higher than test. My understanding is that this is due to the higher risk / presence of side effects with higher test doses, but what if e2 is controlled?
We've discussed receptor competition and it seemed to be commonly accepted that there are so many receptors available that competition between compounds isn't an issue, so it doesn't seem that tren and test would compete for receptors. That said, what is the highest ratio of test/tren that you've used and would you use that again?
Not really looking for definitive answers to a problem--more just hoping to introduce a topic for discussion and curious.
Something interesting said in a thread on tren (originally by CobraStrike, I believe) was along the lines of "tren potentiates test." Anyone have any thoughts on interpreting that?
Between other threads and research elsewhere, it seems most people run tren higher than test. My understanding is that this is due to the higher risk / presence of side effects with higher test doses, but what if e2 is controlled?
We've discussed receptor competition and it seemed to be commonly accepted that there are so many receptors available that competition between compounds isn't an issue, so it doesn't seem that tren and test would compete for receptors. That said, what is the highest ratio of test/tren that you've used and would you use that again?
Not really looking for definitive answers to a problem--more just hoping to introduce a topic for discussion and curious.