Three Batter Minimum

DEADlifter

Elite
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Messages
4,049
Reaction score
7,698
Points
238
I just found out about this today. MLB has a new rule starting this year that any pitcher that comes in must face at least three batters or finish the inning before leaving the game. This is going to be terrible at the end in big games. I don't like it at all.
 

metsfan4life

Elite
SI Founding Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
1,310
Points
113
I just found out about this today. MLB has a new rule starting this year that any pitcher that comes in must face at least three batters or finish the inning before leaving the game. This is going to be terrible at the end in big games. I don't like it at all.


IDK...i mean for the most part in the big games you have your closer come in and get the 3 outs, if they dont get the 3 outs...well they likely ended up losing. now for the middle of the game where you have a specialist come in for that single batter, better freaking hope that its 2-3 righties/lefties in a row they can face or just need 1 single out to end the inning. i think its a stupid rule, you're saving what... 5mins...time to run in from the bullpen and throw 8 pitches. its a long game and people know it...so whats 5 mins
 

DEADlifter

Elite
Joined
Oct 19, 2019
Messages
4,049
Reaction score
7,698
Points
238
IDK...i mean for the most part in the big games you have your closer come in and get the 3 outs, if they dont get the 3 outs...well they likely ended up losing. now for the middle of the game where you have a specialist come in for that single batter, better freaking hope that its 2-3 righties/lefties in a row they can face or just need 1 single out to end the inning. i think its a stupid rule, you're saving what... 5mins...time to run in from the bullpen and throw 8 pitches. its a long game and people know it...so whats 5 mins

Exactly. Stop screwing around with what was once the "national pass time" to appease a generation of television watchers who don't understand it.
 

Assassin32

Elite
SI Founding Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2012
Messages
1,843
Reaction score
1,334
Points
113
Exactly. Stop screwing around with what was once the "national pass time" to appease a generation of television watchers who don't understand it.
It's retarded. What if you bring in a reliever and he gives up a double and a 2-run bomb that ties the game, you still have to let him face another hitter? Bullshit! How many new fans are going to flock to baseball because the game is 4 minutes shorter...none. It's ridiculous. No more left handed specialists coming out of the pen to get a big out late in the game.
 

BigSwolePump

Elite
Joined
Apr 1, 2017
Messages
4,012
Reaction score
4,833
Points
193
Well, it appears that MLB is startling to become the new NFL.

Only an idiot would change rules of a game that has been successful for 150 years.

I will never understand why people want change so badly.

If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
 

metsfan4life

Elite
SI Founding Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2012
Messages
2,143
Reaction score
1,310
Points
113
It's retarded. What if you bring in a reliever and he gives up a double and a 2-run bomb that ties the game, you still have to let him face another hitter? Bullshit! How many new fans are going to flock to baseball because the game is 4 minutes shorter...none. It's ridiculous. No more left handed specialists coming out of the pen to get a big out late in the game.

exactly! only way that left handed specialist comes in is if he's going to be the 3rd out...but then if it doesnt happen... he's screwed. (somewhat...given hes a professional, should be able to handle regardless). 4mins...whoooopie! insane that they are going this route over a few minutes saved, yes its a long game but people know that. much rather watch a long MLB game than watch someone walk the course on golf all day, but thats just me. i got a better idea... 1 pitch - ball you take your base, strike you're out.
 
Top