Ozymandias
Senior Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2018
- Messages
- 124
- Reaction score
- 51
- Points
- 28
Of all the literature on GH I've come across it seems like there's some confusion as to whether GH actually instantiates hyperplasia or whether it promotes anabolism by some other unknown pathway.
Obviously it does SOMETHING, otherwise it wouldn't be used.
I've become a little curious about using it though, considering how a lot of both regular lifters and mass monsters alike incorporate the peptide hormone into their regimens.
I've also seen that if GH is used alone, without the addition of AAS, it doesn't yield much muscle mass.
It seems like most of the claims on GH's efficacy in bodybuilding regimens varies wildly, mostly coming from anecdotal experiences, often without clearly stating what compounds, if any, the GH was used alongside with.
So, anecdotally, has anyone seen significant increases in muscle mass (whether its hypertrophy or hyperplasia is irrelevant) after utilizing GH in conjunction with AAS or insulin?
Has anyone found that GH and AAS gains were even worth adding in the GH (given the price tag)?
Obviously it does SOMETHING, otherwise it wouldn't be used.
I've become a little curious about using it though, considering how a lot of both regular lifters and mass monsters alike incorporate the peptide hormone into their regimens.
I've also seen that if GH is used alone, without the addition of AAS, it doesn't yield much muscle mass.
It seems like most of the claims on GH's efficacy in bodybuilding regimens varies wildly, mostly coming from anecdotal experiences, often without clearly stating what compounds, if any, the GH was used alongside with.
So, anecdotally, has anyone seen significant increases in muscle mass (whether its hypertrophy or hyperplasia is irrelevant) after utilizing GH in conjunction with AAS or insulin?
Has anyone found that GH and AAS gains were even worth adding in the GH (given the price tag)?