- Joined
- Jan 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,125
- Reaction score
- 478
- Points
- 0
Do you think this will be the end of the dark web regs? Seems like it's folding in on itself more and more frequently lately.
No, because there are still significant advantages to using these technologies as opposed to not using them.
Security is a process. Someone can't rely on a proxy to 100% defend themselves. This guy had an enormous overt site dealing in extremely illegal products and services. Not only did he draw the attention of the US government he annoyed other governments too. He was an international menace in their eyes. Think of it this way, is it possible for one guy to out tech the entire world? Even security experts like Theo de Raadt and his team of developers who manage OpenBSD are not without fault. Their operating system has from time to time been found to contain security holes.
At the the end of the day, a tor site is just a server in a rack somewhere. Private contractors and security experts can be hired to exploit the site itself 24 hours a day. It's very difficult to defend yourself against a government with virtually unlimited assets. The larger and more complex a site is the more susceptible to attack it is.
The DOJ is claiming they caught him by simply searching for the origins of the site and subpoenaing information based upon their search results from the clear net. No proxy is going to defend someone if they leave a trail of their true identity all over the net. The guy used a gmail address which included his real name to approach people for coding his site. When he first started the site maybe he didn't comprehend how intense the scruteny of him was going to be. I'm sure there was a technical attack occurring alongside the traditional gumshoe approach which is not mentioned in the criminal complaint. The DOJ launders intelligence so it's difficult to know how the government actually caught him.
Last edited: