A Tale of Two Labs...

[mattyice]

So I am going to log 2 UGL's test enan with blood panels to side by side compare efficacy. One lab loved...the other hated. A true Pepsi challenge, if you will. I thinking 4 weeks of each lab should be enough time for saturation. Is 4 weeks seem fair

 

[Dtownry]

Interasante...

 

[Jada]

Sounds cool but make sure u get a ok from UR ugl before u post there name since they might not want there bizness out there . Last thing u want is to get hot

 

[Four1Thr33]

Sounds fun.. When is the first test?

 

[LeanHerm]

Yeah make sure you watch what you say. Souce talk is sketchy

 

[mattyice]

Theoretically, I'll draw first bloods in June. I don't have any source... this is just an idea. : )

 

[SFGiants]

Theoretically, I'll draw first bloods in June. I don't have any source... this is just an idea. : )

Bad idea also!

All this will do is piss one source off and possible cause drama.

 

[j2048b]

subbed if done... inquiring minds want to know... the outcome of each

 

[j2048b]

subbed if done... inquiring minds want to know... the outcome of each

yeah what sfg said, might cause a stir,

 

[mattyice]

Bad idea also!

All this will do is piss one source off and possible cause drama.

Yeah... unless they both are gtg.

 

[Tilltheend]

Sounds good look forward to the results.

 

[JAXNY]

Theoretically, I'll draw first bloods in June. I don't have any source... this is just an idea. : )

This may be a dumb question. But wouldn't
It just be easier and quicker to lab test each
Product for potency and quality?

 

[PFM]

SI turning into E****s or S*********y and guys encourage that shit?

 

[mattyice]

This may be a dumb question. But wouldn't
It just be easier and quicker to lab test each
Product for potency and quality?

I have no idea where you could have such a thing done... but I guess it would be easier and quicker.

 

[coltmc4545]

I don't like the comparison thing but I see absolutely nothing wrong with posting labs from a source AS LONG as that source isn't private or unless you have alterior motives for doing this which I think might be the case. People post labs on GH. That being said, if any of your labs come back shitty, whether its the one you love or the one you hate, the right thing to do would be to contact that lab before blasting them across boards and give them a chance to rectify the situation. Anyone can get a bad batch of raws here and there and if the UGL's legit then it's not thier fault and they shouldn't get a bad name because of it. Just my opinion.

 

[mattyice]

SI turning into E****s or S*********y and guys encourage that shit?

PFM,
Your so predictable...
Love,
Matty
xoxo

 

[trim]

I think its a bad idea. This is not a source board, so whats the point?

 

[mattyice]

It seems everyone (not just here) hates on a certain lab, and others (not just here) gush over another. I would be interested to know if its worth the salt.

 

[Four1Thr33]

I think its a bad idea. This is not a source board, so whats the point?

Ya but labs have never been an issue to talk about or post blood work

Sure it may piss off that lab but if they are making on point products the blood won't lie

 

[coltmc4545]

The only on point product a UGL can produce that you can tell is legit is test which is the cheapest compound to make. And maybe a 19 nor if you run it long enough and let your progesterone levels go crazy. A lab can have test off the charts and shitty tren, var, primo. A lab can also get a bad batch of test raws and have bomb ass tren var and primo.