Hold the UGLs and Sources Accountable

Joined
Aug 18, 2018
Messages
11,867
Reaction score
28,942
Points
403
The greens and peasants get one too..

This is for members AND the sources. There’s value for both. It also works across boards but good luck trying it on a source forum.

There is access to HPLC lab testing. There is janoshik.com and Lab4Tox.pl (in Polish but if you scroll to the bottom there is an email address available and Anna will be happy to reply). You don’t have to merely “trust” your source anymore. Those days are long behind us. You also don’t need to rely on bloodwork, which varies greatly person-to-person and only works for testosterone products.

Sources should test because this is your reputation. Plus, you’re buying from your raws supplier and you should be interested in getting what you pay for. That’s your own quality control to protect your reputation. Since you’re testing anyway, you should post it up. Customers are wowed by this. It looks good. It’s marketing. Boom, now you can advertise “fully tested gear”. That will bring the customers to your door ready to throw bitcoins at you, you can charge more. You are providing near-pharma accurately dosed gear. The best product a UGL can offer. Maybe provide a batch number on the side of the vial to reference with the lab tests. Wow!

Now here’s where the members need to be active. Members need to spot check the products just to make sure the UGL isn’t brewing their best stuff just to send for lab-testing. It sure would be nice if the UGL would offer store credit for testing. Afterall, this is the true litmus test. Now it’s near-pharma accurately dosed gear that has been verified by blind testing. Pretty difficult to fake all that. The UGL is held in very high regard now. Think of how much product will move and adjust your prices according to supple and demand rather than just based on the competition’s costs.

Guys are WILLING to pay more for verified great gear. You are now running your enterprise like a legitimate business. You’ve elevated from online drug dealer to online provider of crafted performance enhancement products. Your name is legendary and the customers become a loyal following.

We also learn quickly which chinamen suppliers are fucking the UGL and our entire community with shitty raws. The ones that do business that way get flushed out, leaving the better suppliers to serve everyone’s needs.

This is catching on every forum. Even forums that protect their sources with censored threads. The UGLs that don’t test become bottom-barrel bathtub providers, always wondering if they are one-customer-submitted-sample away from forced retirement.
 

turkey_sandwich

Senior Member
Joined
Oct 24, 2022
Messages
1,370
Reaction score
1,717
Points
113
What is the minimum % a compound should be on a hplc test to be considered good?
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2024
Messages
19
Reaction score
6
Points
3
Agree.

I think sources should be showing their labs, especially the cleaning ajd disinfecting they do. Having a quality made product made in a proper lab is more important than anything. Know its safe and harm reduction is the most important. I want to know its coming from a clean, sterilized and maintained facility. If a source cannot do that, they aren't worth ordering from. And anyone who scams or cannot produce such evidence should be lit up by the community.

As well as both raw and finished jano testing, and results from blind client tests. They should pay for the jano testinf and give skme extra credit, as those are the tests that really matter in my opinion. Its easy to send in your good batch for testing than skimp others.
 

New Threads

Top