- Joined
- Sep 1, 2022
- Messages
- 30
- Reaction score
- 20
- Points
- 3
I am wondering why someone would choose to use a steroid hormone attached to an ester with a short half life indefinitely, or for a long period of time (12+ weeks) as opposed to a compound attached to an ester with a relatively longer half life.
For instance, I have talked to and heard from individuals people using test prop or npp as their HRT / cruise. Why not use testosterone cypionate + nandrolone decanoate instead? It seems like one could get away with less shots and less overall oil (as the longer esters typically come in higher concentrations)? These individuals are never coming "off" so, why the short ester?
In other cases, I've seen individuals use compounds such as drostanolone propionate + tren acetate for the entirety of their 12+ week anabolic cycles. I can somewhat understand this logic as at the start of the blast, the compounds will reach peak blood serum concentrations more quickly, and will dissipate more quickly when the person returns back to cruise (or pct). Is there perhaps some other reason I am missing, though?
Appreciate your insight!
For instance, I have talked to and heard from individuals people using test prop or npp as their HRT / cruise. Why not use testosterone cypionate + nandrolone decanoate instead? It seems like one could get away with less shots and less overall oil (as the longer esters typically come in higher concentrations)? These individuals are never coming "off" so, why the short ester?
In other cases, I've seen individuals use compounds such as drostanolone propionate + tren acetate for the entirety of their 12+ week anabolic cycles. I can somewhat understand this logic as at the start of the blast, the compounds will reach peak blood serum concentrations more quickly, and will dissipate more quickly when the person returns back to cruise (or pct). Is there perhaps some other reason I am missing, though?
Appreciate your insight!