MrRippedZilla
Retired
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2014
- Messages
- 1,706
- Reaction score
- 3,522
- Points
- 153
AAS doesn't change muscle shapes, attachments, bone structure, etc. I don't need to introduce AAS into the mix in order to know that a dude with a horrible shoulder to hip ratio probably isn't destined to do well on the stage.I'm not so sure about that. Hear me out. Someone needs to have played their AAS card for their ultimate potential to been seen as a pro.
There use to an argument that in a world without drugs, those elite lifters would fair the same in the PED world. That seems reasonable that the same cream would rise to the top but it is untrue. With all things being equal, it's the response to those drugs that will ultimately determine how far you will go in the Pros.
AAS doesn't change the process of muscle growth - it merely accelerates it. What AAS does teach us is how susceptible an individual is to its side effects, which is the limiting factor when it comes to increasing doses and, therefore, continuing to progress over time. It tells me nothing I didn't already know when it comes to how much muscle someone is actually likely to gain on your typical 600mg 12 week 1st cycle. This is subjective, you are entitled to disagree.
Also, all things won't be equal. The elite natural is likely to have an easy 20-25 pound head start over the genetically average. The only way for that average dude to make up that inevitable difference is to start using straight away. Something I know neither of us are advocating.