- Joined
- May 26, 2012
- Messages
- 2,940
- Reaction score
- 860
- Points
- 113
well all or any of those things would happen within a few weeks. And yes, genetics plays a part in some sides. But now that the subject came up it's a good opportunity for me to add that the LONGER the cycle the higher the chances for sides to worsen or even formulate if at 1st you weren't experiencing any. At least any noticeable ones. So why drag your 1st cycle so far out? It's just not neccessary. Most of us have ran longer ones, including myself. But your 1st is not necessary. Even future cycles if you plan on cycling on and off shouldn't go further. I wouldn'trecommend it unless you make the decision to actually start blasting and cruising or trt which you'll end up on anyway
I understand. My opinion is opposite to yours.
I don't think that length is too long when it comes to hormones. 12-16 weeks is a drop in the bucket in the context of life span.
I DO think that 16 week cycles should not be a consistent choice if the person cycles on and off.
I'm glad I decided to never come off, but I wouldn't direct anyone to stay on perpetually.