- Joined
- Aug 20, 2012
- Messages
- 4,190
- Reaction score
- 3,398
- Points
- 193
Well there must be way to select RIR as the research studies had 2 like group of individuals ... they measured their 1 rep maximum and them had those 2 groups 1 of whom worked to failure and other group worked 0-3 RIR ... and the hypertrophy was measured at the end of the studies both groups had the same amount of muscle growth ... so to say it is not possible to measure RIR is not factually true based on those studies ...Yes, I read it, and yes, it does say that training close to failure can be just as effective for hypertrophy. I was focusing on the "main takeaway", though: "My main takeaway from this meta-analysis is that most people self-select loads that are probably too light to build much muscle."
The studies make a strong case for training with reps in reserve, but the research also shows that people self-select loads which are too light and underestimate how many reps in reserve they actually have. While it is in theory possible to train with reps in reserve and get good results, how can you possibly know how many reps in reserve you actually have without going to failure at least once?
However I agree on a practical basis at the gym daily we all know where failure is on every workout set if we lift to the point we cannot do another rep ... which is exactly what I'm changed my routine to do ...
I prefer this method because it has reduced my workout sets from 4 to 2 ... which also allows me to rest 3+ minutes between every workout set ... but still keeps most workouts close to 1 hour ...