- Joined
- Jul 2, 2021
- Messages
- 386
- Reaction score
- 347
- Points
- 43
To the old timers I started with in NYC years ago, and reading from the classic guys and the old magazines, rice was considered basically junk food--empty calories. Yet it's a common dietary staple mentioned favorably here. From a nutrition standpoint it's nothing compared to a potato. Potato has less calories, more protein, less fat, seven times the fiber, double the calcium, four times the iron, four times the magnesium, twice the phosphorous, sixteen times the potassium, is vastly higher in all the B vitamins, and has a high vitamin C content compared to none for rice. Rice, though, is quite high in selenium. But, I must be missing something???? Cost, convenience?